July 7, 2010 | Vol.
60, No. 13
respond | preferences | login | unsubscribe |
![]() |
Dear PEI Member: Three important announcements were made late last month that affect the marketing of mid-level ethanol blends. They include: EPA delays the E15 waiver decision. The Environmental Protection Agency says it will wait until this fall to decide whether vehicle engines can handle higher concentrations of ethanol in gasoline. The agency had been expected to decide by mid-year whether to increase the maximum blend from 10 to 15 percent. EPA said in its announcement that initial tests "look good" and should be completed by the end of September. A decision will come after the Energy Department completes the testing of the higher blend on vehicles built since 2007. EPA said it is also testing some vehicles built before 2007 but will make a decision after the newer vehicle testing is completed. DOE also is testing tanks and other fuel handling equipment to see how they might be affected by E15. Not only has the time frame been delayed, but the possible number of vehicles involved has been reduced dramatically. at least in the short term. Originally, EPA had stated they would make the decision for E15 for all vehicles made in 2001 or later. In this most recent announcement, EPA said the decision would now only include vehicles made in 2007 or later, lowering the number of affected vehicles to 20 percent of the U.S. market. EPA stated that another announcement about the use of E15 in older vehicles (i.e., made before 2007) would come later in the fall. This is the second time EPA has announced a delay on its decision on the E15 waiver petition. The agency pushed the decision to this summer last December, saying further testing was needed. Petroleum marketers contend that other issues have to be resolved before retailers can feel confident about selling E15, including misfueling liability issues; pump labeling requirements; fire code and OSHA requirements; and the tank insurance state fund and business loan agreements they have with third parties. UL lists E85 dispensers. Underwriters Laboratories (UL) has certified fuel-dispensing systems designed to be used with ethanol fuel concentrations up to E85 (85 percent ethanol; 15 percent gasoline). The fuel-dispensing system includes the dispenser, hose, nozzle, swivel, breakaway, and shear valves. Both the Gilbarco Veeder-Root Encore® and the Dresser Wayne Ovation® Eco fueling E85 dispensers have been certified. The impact of the approval enables the petroleum marketing industry to build the much-needed infrastructure to support ethanol with equipment that is legal (approved) to operate. The question now will be what officials in states that granted a waiver or variance (e.g., CA, CO, DE, IL, IA, MI, MO, MN, NY, OH, OR, WV, WI) to use an alternate dispenser design that was not listed by UL will do with the many dispensing systems currently in E85 service. Fire code amendment defeated. An amendment to the National Fire
Protection Association's (NFPA) Code for Motor Fuel Dispensing Facilities
and Repair Garages (NFPA 30A) that would have made it easier―and
legal―for service stations to dispense mid-level
ethanol blends (E15) using equipment that is not listed for E15 by a
nationally-recognized testing organization like UL was defeated by the
committee responsible for the document. The measure fell two votes shy of
the 75 percent majority vote needed to pass the amendment. Fire officials
who commented on the amendment thought that the proposed language was
ambiguous and not detailed enough to allow authorities having jurisdiction
to make informed decisions when reviewing legacy (i.e., existing) dispensing
devices for higher ethanol blends. |
Surplus Videos Now Available
by e-mail to the editor, Robert Renkes at rrenkes@pei.org or join the discussion in the Petroleum Equipment Forum to unsubscribe or change preferences see below. |
The defeat of the amendment is thought by many industry observers to have less of an impact now that dispensers listed by UL for concentrations of fuel ethanol up to E85 are available. Furthermore, gasoline marketers who have been using the equivalency section of the fire code to get non-listed equipment approved for use with ethanol blends greater than E10 believe that option will still be available to them. NCWM TO CONSIDER PROPOSED CHANGE TO "REMAN" DEFINITION The proposal is a change to Section G-A-6 of Handbook 44, the publication used by most weights and measures authorities in the United States. The proposed changes are indicated below in bold text:
These may appear to be minor changes, but many believe they could have a major impact on businesses that remanufacture fuel dispensers and their component parts. PEI members and other observers have raised several questions as this issue has been considered at various regional weights and measures meetings across the country. For instance, they want to know:
The regional weights and measures entities are equally split on this issue, with half in favor of voting on the change next week while the other half recommends the Conference not vote but rather view this material as "informational." PEI will attend the National Conference on Weights and Measures meeting in St. Paul and hopes to learn the answers to these questions and report back to you. If you have other questions on this issue that you would like us to raise, please contact us. PRICE POSTING UNDER SCRUTINY BY NCWM PETROLEUM MARKETING NOTES PEI SEEKING FIND RED VOLUNTEERS AT CONVENTION IN ATLANTA MEMBERSHIP APPLICATIONS ADMITTED TO PEI
|
|
![]()
This newsletter is a member benefit of the Petroleum Equipment Institute. To unsubscribe by email click here or manage all your newsletter subscriptions online at www.pei.org/membersonly. Do not reply to this message. PEI® and the PEI mark are registered trademarks |
![]()
©2010 The TulsaLetter (ISSN 0193-9467) is published two or three times each month by the Petroleum Equipment Institute. Robert N. Renkes, Executive Vice President, Editor. Opinions expressed are the opinions of the Editor. Basic circulation confined to PEI members. |