respond | preferences | login | unsubscribe |
![]() |
Dear PEI Member: Traditionally the oil industry has been the sole voice of temperance amid the hubbub in Congress for the use of more alternative fuels to reduce US dependence on foreign oil. Now environmental groups are joining some academics and other stakeholders to point out the downside of certain alternative fuel bills that will be considered by Congress in the months ahead. The bill before the Senate, which mandates the use of 36 billion gallons of alternative and renewable fuels by 2023, has caused groups such as the Natural Resources Defense Council, Friends of the Earth, and Clean Air Watch to issue warnings to lawmakers that they are rushing through legislation without full consideration of the potential damage to the environment and the impact on climatic change. Since available scientific evidence already suggests that the existing renewable fuels mandate of 7.5 billion gallons of ethanol and other biofuels would increase smog-causing pollutants like nitrogen oxide and hydrocarbons, the groups fear that an increase to the mandate could only worsen air pollutants. Environmental groups cite a rule recently issued by EPA that eases air quality requirements for ethanol production facilities as proof that Congress is not considering adequate safeguards to protect the environment. Meanwhile, a report (www.pei.org/frd) issued by Stanford University professor Mark Jacobson claims if all vehicles ran on E85 in 2020 (hypothetically, the author admits), that E85 may be responsible for increasing ozone-related mortality, hospitalization, and asthma. He estimates the increase would be about 9 percent in Los Angeles and 4 percent in the United States as a whole relative to gasoline without any ethanol. Jacobson goes on to say that “due to its ozone effects, future E85 may be a greater overall public health risk than gasoline. However, because of the uncertainty in future emission regulations, it can be concluded with confidence only that E85 is unlikely to improve air quality over future gasoline vehicles.” The big question now is how many lawmakers in Congress
are willing to stop and study the issue before they advance the legislation.
With efforts to boost biofuels seen as enhancing national security and
helping rural Americans, my guess there won’t be enough to slow things down. |
Alternative Fuels and Congress by e-mail to Robert Renkes at rrenkes@pei.org or join the discussion in the Petroleum Equipment Forum to change your address or e-mail preferences see below. |
EPA RELEASES DRAFT GUIDELINES FOR TRAINING UST
OPERATORS The guidance breaks down operators into three classifications. Class A operators, those with supervisory responsibility, are required to be trained in spill prevention, overfill prevention, release detection, corrosion protection, emergency response, notification requirements, release and suspected release reporting, and temporary and permanent closure requirements. They also must have a general knowledge of tank requirements and be able to make informed decisions regarding compliance with federal requirements and the assignment of appropriate personnel to daily operations. In addition to all requirements for Class A operators, Class B operators–those with daily responsibility–must be trained in the components and materials of an underground storage tank system. Class C operators, those who are responsible for responding first to an emergency, must be trained in emergency response. States must require operators to be trained by August 8, 2012. EPA is taking comments on the draft guidance until May 10. TWO DISTRIBUTORS OPEN NEW BRANCHES REGULATORY BRIEFS APPOINTMENTS NORTH AMERICAN PETROLEUM MARKETING ACQUISITIONS DEATHS YOUNG DISTRIBUTION PROFESSIONALS CONFERENCE SOLD OUT MEMBERSHIP APPLICATIONS ADMITTED TO PEI
|
|
![]()
This newsletter was sent to [Your_Name] at [email] To remove [email] from this mailing list click: [removal_link] To read archived newsletters, subscribe or unsubscribe go to: www.pei.org/membersonly/tulsaletter
Do not reply to this message. |
![]()
©2006
The TulsaLetter (ISSN 0193-9467) is published two or three times each month by the Petroleum Equipment Institute. Robert N. Renkes, Executive Vice President, Editor. Opinions expressed are the opinions of the Editor. Basic circulation confined to PEI members. |
PEI® and the PEI mark are registered trademarks
of the Petroleum Equipment
Institute.
Copyright © 2007 All rights reserved.